![]() ![]() Work efficiently with new task-oriented a whole user interface. Sibelius sound sets free software#That's really the same issue with guitar, mandolin and (particularly) banjo- not just a blend of tones, but a whole mix of timbre and overtone spectra between strings picked and sympathetic vibrations.The latest generation of music notation software best selling in the world, Avid Sibelius 7 is sophisticated enough to meet the demands of the greatest composers, arrangers and publishers, but also easy to access for beginners and students. The main problem is that bagpipe sound is never just one sound- it's a blend of the drones and the interplay of their harmonics with the harmonics of each chanter note, giving each note its own unique timbre. In Sibelius, you have the option of upgrading to the "Gold" level of Kontakt Sounds, which give you more instrument choices, but I'm not sure that would provide you with the sound you're looking for. ![]() I don't try to make realistic bagpipe sounds in Sibelius, but here's what (almost) works in Lime, another program I use for bagpipe compositions:įor GHB or Lowland pipes, I use bassoon for the chanter and bassoon and/or bari sax for the drones.Ī couple of other possibilities- export the file over to GarageBand, and use the bagpipe sounds from the World Music pack ( but you'd have to buy that, it's not part of thebasic package) I use Sibelius for band and chorus scores, or rather I did, having just retired from teaching in public school. What instruments does anyone else feel disappointed with the sound of, as most of us do with the bagpipe sound? This got me to wondering today, why is it possible with SOME instruments and not others, to get more realistic sound? I'd have thought that since violins have strings and so do guitars, and since oboes have reeds and so do bagpipes, that what was good for the goose was good for the gander. When writing for guitar, I find the guitar sound to be frustrating, like the bagpipe one. Similarly with oboe, organ and some other instruments- the sound is passable and to Mr and Mrs Bloggs quite pleasant and no reason to go asking why a real person isn't playing it. The final result (sound) was so good, this couple played it to all the visitors who came to see their new home, and all were delighted by it and wanted to know 'who' (not 'what') was playing it. Then I made an mp3 of it and copied it to a CD and gave it to the person it was written for (it was a 'new home' kind of thing). I wrote a piece for solo violin and piano. I was wondering today though about the following. ![]() It sure ain't realistic, but it works well enough.Tim, this is what I do too-use other wind instruments. And if I'm writing something specifically for smallpipes, I will drop the chanter line down one octave. Typically I assign the drone lines to sound as bassoons. If I'm really needing to hear how it might sound on the pipes better, I might create a second version of the score, adding the drones into the bass clef. So instead I assign chanter lines to sound as a clarinet (or maybe bassoon/oboe). ![]() Even if you were able to use a high quality sample, you might still have the issues of volumes for high- and low-notes - which differ between Highland and smallpipes, of course. But I long ago gave up on the realistic bagpipe sound. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |